Italy have the best goalkeeper in the world, Buffon. In the World Cup final on Sunday, it will be the Italians against France and Buffon against the bona fide buffoon the French have for a goalie. That’s Barthez, a bald clown who has been struggling with simple saves and all but cost the French the semi-final against Portugal.
“There are goalkeepers who bring out funny little toys and put them in the back of the net as good luck charms. For France’s veterans, Barthez is the funny little good luck charm. Laurent Blanc, the centre half on the run to the final in 1998, used to kiss the top of the goalie’s bald head before every game. It is tough on Gregory Coupet, the best goalkeeper in France last season, who stood in while Barthez served a five-month suspension for spitting at a referee. At 33, Coupet is sitting on the bench watching his last chance of appearing in a World Cup slide away. But Domenech is concerned with the well-being of the team as a whole...it is a one-for-all, all-for one philosophy,” says the IHT’s Peter Berlin.
Because as badly as the vets, like Zidane, like Thuram, like Makelele, want to win, they don’t want to win at any cost. Not without their buffoon, their buddy, their Barthez. My brother calls them cliquey. You can also call them musketeer-y.
Friday, July 07, 2006
Thursday, July 06, 2006
Vino 2, Bier 0
Italy is a land of artists, from Donatello, Michelangelo, Raphael and da Vinci to Dolce & Gabbana and Prada to Pirlo. Pirlo? Pirlo. The name is Andrea Pirlo and the game is soccer at its most sublime.
With two more minutes of extra time vs Germany, in the 119th minute of the semi-final, with the score still nail-bitingly at 0-0, the ball bounced out from a corner to Pirlo’s boot. In front of him, there was the goal, as well as three Germans. Somehow, they didn’t at all know how, he passed the ball just a bit out of their path.
“How, after almost two hours of football played at a relentless pace, he was able to control the ball, make as if to shoot, then move right and slip a gorgeous little pass through to Grosso, must remain a mystery to lesser mortals,” blogs the IHT’s Roger Cohen.
Pirlo’s pass became the first goal, curled in by Grosso. In the 121st and last minute, another Italian artist, Del Piero, came up with the second goal. The Germans were in tears. All I could do was chant, “Del Piero! Del Piero! Del Piero! Italia! Italia! Italia! Italia!”
I feel for the Germans. They are like us. We are like them. They are kiasu. They are famous for their competence. They have everything down to a science. But art won last night – inspiring Italian art – and it was really something to see.
My friend, M, has a fine theory of taste in football. Beer people go for beer countries like Germany and wine people, for wine countries like Italy, she says. I am, at heart, a wine person. Which may be why, in spite of my sympathy for Germany’s bier, I ended up going for Italy’s vino last night.
Tonight it is Portugal’s volatile vinho vs France’s vintage vin. France and Zidane are so vintage, they can’t keep for four more years. It has to be now or never. It has to be France and Italy in the final. It better be.
With two more minutes of extra time vs Germany, in the 119th minute of the semi-final, with the score still nail-bitingly at 0-0, the ball bounced out from a corner to Pirlo’s boot. In front of him, there was the goal, as well as three Germans. Somehow, they didn’t at all know how, he passed the ball just a bit out of their path.
“How, after almost two hours of football played at a relentless pace, he was able to control the ball, make as if to shoot, then move right and slip a gorgeous little pass through to Grosso, must remain a mystery to lesser mortals,” blogs the IHT’s Roger Cohen.
Pirlo’s pass became the first goal, curled in by Grosso. In the 121st and last minute, another Italian artist, Del Piero, came up with the second goal. The Germans were in tears. All I could do was chant, “Del Piero! Del Piero! Del Piero! Italia! Italia! Italia! Italia!”
I feel for the Germans. They are like us. We are like them. They are kiasu. They are famous for their competence. They have everything down to a science. But art won last night – inspiring Italian art – and it was really something to see.
My friend, M, has a fine theory of taste in football. Beer people go for beer countries like Germany and wine people, for wine countries like Italy, she says. I am, at heart, a wine person. Which may be why, in spite of my sympathy for Germany’s bier, I ended up going for Italy’s vino last night.
Tonight it is Portugal’s volatile vinho vs France’s vintage vin. France and Zidane are so vintage, they can’t keep for four more years. It has to be now or never. It has to be France and Italy in the final. It better be.
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
Soccer schizo
They don’t call it the World Cup for nothing. Like other World somethings – World Wars One and Two spring to mind – the fun is in being for or against a team. Are you cheering your country or continent on? Are you for the Allied forces of Beautiful Football, like France, or the Axis powers of Boring Football, like Germany? Have you put your heart where your mouth is?
We in Singapore are free from the tyranny of having to cheer our country on – the team never made the finals – so many Singaporeans end up as default England fans. Those who are colonial or sold on the brand of David Beckham, that is. I am pro-Asia. Well, more pro-South Korea than pro-Japan. It is one thing for me to be fond of Japanese films, Japanese food and my Japanese friends and another thing to be a flag-flying fan of the Japan team, somehow. When Australia played Japan, I was for Japan but my boos at Australia were louder than my cheers for Japan, somehow. Maybe I didn’t know how to cheer for an Asian country that might not want to be an Asian country. Or it might have been simpler to support South Korea, because those tigers played harder than Japan.
After the Asians got kicked out, I briefly went Brangelina, rooting for Ghana, the Brazil of Africa, the top dog of the underdogs. But the African Brazil got outplayed by the Brazilian Brazil, who have now been beaten by the most African of the European teams, France.
So it is France vs Portugal and Germany vs Italy in the semi-finals and I am about to go schizo here.
On the one hand, as a Francophile and a Zinedine Zidanephile, I want France to win. On the other hand, I don’t want Portugal to lose badly. The Ah Lian in me loves the Portuguese Ah Beng, Cristiano Ronaldo, the bad boy who wears too much hair mousse and allegedly winked at his bench after he allegedly encouraged the referee to dismiss English striker Wayne Rooney in the quarter-final. I adore bad. On the third hand, I love Italy’s fashion sense and silky footwork. On the fourth hand, I don’t hate Germany. Their goalie had notes on Argentinian penalties in the quarter-final! The kiasu Singaporean student in me gets that.
To be all mugger about it:
France = world-class retirees (Zidane, Lilian Thuram, Claude Makelele)
Portugal = world-class Beng (Ronaldo) + world-class coach (Luiz Felipe Scolari)
Italy = world-class (con) artists
Germany = world-class 11-man machine
How?
We in Singapore are free from the tyranny of having to cheer our country on – the team never made the finals – so many Singaporeans end up as default England fans. Those who are colonial or sold on the brand of David Beckham, that is. I am pro-Asia. Well, more pro-South Korea than pro-Japan. It is one thing for me to be fond of Japanese films, Japanese food and my Japanese friends and another thing to be a flag-flying fan of the Japan team, somehow. When Australia played Japan, I was for Japan but my boos at Australia were louder than my cheers for Japan, somehow. Maybe I didn’t know how to cheer for an Asian country that might not want to be an Asian country. Or it might have been simpler to support South Korea, because those tigers played harder than Japan.
After the Asians got kicked out, I briefly went Brangelina, rooting for Ghana, the Brazil of Africa, the top dog of the underdogs. But the African Brazil got outplayed by the Brazilian Brazil, who have now been beaten by the most African of the European teams, France.
So it is France vs Portugal and Germany vs Italy in the semi-finals and I am about to go schizo here.
On the one hand, as a Francophile and a Zinedine Zidanephile, I want France to win. On the other hand, I don’t want Portugal to lose badly. The Ah Lian in me loves the Portuguese Ah Beng, Cristiano Ronaldo, the bad boy who wears too much hair mousse and allegedly winked at his bench after he allegedly encouraged the referee to dismiss English striker Wayne Rooney in the quarter-final. I adore bad. On the third hand, I love Italy’s fashion sense and silky footwork. On the fourth hand, I don’t hate Germany. Their goalie had notes on Argentinian penalties in the quarter-final! The kiasu Singaporean student in me gets that.
To be all mugger about it:
France = world-class retirees (Zidane, Lilian Thuram, Claude Makelele)
Portugal = world-class Beng (Ronaldo) + world-class coach (Luiz Felipe Scolari)
Italy = world-class (con) artists
Germany = world-class 11-man machine
How?
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
Drink drank drunk #2
“How did you quit?”
My friend, who is addicted to the treasure trove of videos on YouTube, puts a question to me, the Mike Ho-YouTube addict apparently on the mend. Actually I am not. I didn’t quit. All I have done is give up one addiction for another, to the World Cup.
Mike, for all his marvellous mischievous qualities, is one boy. The World Cup is many boys – and men – on the pitch whom I watch with the boys in my living room. I am not a natural football fan. Footwear, not footy, is more me. But once in four years, it is just a joy to be drunk on the World Cup with my brothers.
And to be united not only in our love of the beautiful game but also in our dislike of, say, Australia’s Socceroos. They play such a physical ugly game they should have signed up for rugby, really. Mr T, the professional football fan, calls them Planet Of The Apes.
How do we dislike them? Let me count the ways.
Last Monday night, I gave up the press preview of Superman Returns. Because I had to be home for Italy vs Australia, because I wanted to watch them lose. (Don’t ask me which them.)
Minutes after I made up my mind to give up the preview, my brother, Fei, SMSed to remind me: We had to be home for the match, we wanted to watch them lose.
We wanted it so much, we even bet on them. As he put it to me, “We want Italy to win right? We are willing to lose money for them right? It’s investing in Italy right? If they win we will be glad to lose money, if they lose we will be si beh sad but we will win $60 right?”
Right, right, right, right. His plan made perverse sense to me. We bet $10 each on Australia. So Italy won, Australia lost and in China a CCTV commentator went into a crazy pro-Italy anti-Australia rant, “Goooooal! Game over! Italy win! Beat the Australians! They do not fall in front of Hiddink again! Italy the great! Left back the great! Happy birthday to Maldini! Forza Italia! The victory belongs to Italy, to Grosso, to Cannavaro, to Zambrotta, to Buffon, to Maldini, to everyone who loves Italian soccer! Hiddink…lost all his courage faced with Italian history and traditions…he finally reaped fruits which he had sown! They should go home!”
He is a man after my own crazy heart. Me, I got a great kick out of losing $10.
My friend, who is addicted to the treasure trove of videos on YouTube, puts a question to me, the Mike Ho-YouTube addict apparently on the mend. Actually I am not. I didn’t quit. All I have done is give up one addiction for another, to the World Cup.
Mike, for all his marvellous mischievous qualities, is one boy. The World Cup is many boys – and men – on the pitch whom I watch with the boys in my living room. I am not a natural football fan. Footwear, not footy, is more me. But once in four years, it is just a joy to be drunk on the World Cup with my brothers.
And to be united not only in our love of the beautiful game but also in our dislike of, say, Australia’s Socceroos. They play such a physical ugly game they should have signed up for rugby, really. Mr T, the professional football fan, calls them Planet Of The Apes.
How do we dislike them? Let me count the ways.
Last Monday night, I gave up the press preview of Superman Returns. Because I had to be home for Italy vs Australia, because I wanted to watch them lose. (Don’t ask me which them.)
Minutes after I made up my mind to give up the preview, my brother, Fei, SMSed to remind me: We had to be home for the match, we wanted to watch them lose.
We wanted it so much, we even bet on them. As he put it to me, “We want Italy to win right? We are willing to lose money for them right? It’s investing in Italy right? If they win we will be glad to lose money, if they lose we will be si beh sad but we will win $60 right?”
Right, right, right, right. His plan made perverse sense to me. We bet $10 each on Australia. So Italy won, Australia lost and in China a CCTV commentator went into a crazy pro-Italy anti-Australia rant, “Goooooal! Game over! Italy win! Beat the Australians! They do not fall in front of Hiddink again! Italy the great! Left back the great! Happy birthday to Maldini! Forza Italia! The victory belongs to Italy, to Grosso, to Cannavaro, to Zambrotta, to Buffon, to Maldini, to everyone who loves Italian soccer! Hiddink…lost all his courage faced with Italian history and traditions…he finally reaped fruits which he had sown! They should go home!”
He is a man after my own crazy heart. Me, I got a great kick out of losing $10.
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Drink drank drunk #1
We are girls who get a bit drunk on Tony Leung Chiu Wai films auteured by Wong Kar Wai, the master of moody cinema; Faye Wong songs authored by Lin Xi, the sad-love-song specialist; movies that match Tony with Faye (Chungking Express, Chinese Odyssey 2002 and 2046); and above all, the retro resplendence of the world of Wong Kar Wai.
So it was that Ms C, Ms H and I, dressed in our retro best, came together to celebrate Tony’s birthday yesterday over dinner at the Wong Kar Wai-esque New Majestic Hotel. To be more drunk, I had champagne. The party truly began before that, however. It was in the air all day at work, as colleagues stopped us to say, “Show me your dress,” or, “So who are you?”
Ms H: I’m Faye from 2046.
Me: I’m Su Lizhen.
Colleague: Ni hao.
Su Lizhen: Ni hao.
Faye: Why did you speak to Su Lizhen only ah?
Colleague: Because Faye seldom says anything mah.
Actually, Su Lizhen is also a woman of few words. Her cheong sam are louder than her. She overdresses for occasions like buying noodles downstairs. What she wants is to feel more alive and I know what that feels like. I’m just not as good as her at getting in and out of a car when wearing a tight cheong sam. But by the end of yesterday, after a couple of almost-injuries to my knees when I went in feet first, I learnt to roll in and out on my rump with relative ease. Notice I didn’t say elegance.

Faye and Su Lizhen.

Mrs Tony and shark fin soup.

A Faye Wong music video moment: How well the dress goes with the wall!

Kiasu mugger method acting: This Su Lizhen has a wuxia book because that Su Lizhen in that movie had a wuxia book, too.

After dinner. My dress tighter.
So it was that Ms C, Ms H and I, dressed in our retro best, came together to celebrate Tony’s birthday yesterday over dinner at the Wong Kar Wai-esque New Majestic Hotel. To be more drunk, I had champagne. The party truly began before that, however. It was in the air all day at work, as colleagues stopped us to say, “Show me your dress,” or, “So who are you?”
Ms H: I’m Faye from 2046.
Me: I’m Su Lizhen.
Colleague: Ni hao.
Su Lizhen: Ni hao.
Faye: Why did you speak to Su Lizhen only ah?
Colleague: Because Faye seldom says anything mah.
Actually, Su Lizhen is also a woman of few words. Her cheong sam are louder than her. She overdresses for occasions like buying noodles downstairs. What she wants is to feel more alive and I know what that feels like. I’m just not as good as her at getting in and out of a car when wearing a tight cheong sam. But by the end of yesterday, after a couple of almost-injuries to my knees when I went in feet first, I learnt to roll in and out on my rump with relative ease. Notice I didn’t say elegance.

Faye and Su Lizhen.

Mrs Tony and shark fin soup.

A Faye Wong music video moment: How well the dress goes with the wall!

Kiasu mugger method acting: This Su Lizhen has a wuxia book because that Su Lizhen in that movie had a wuxia book, too.

After dinner. My dress tighter.
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
THE FUNCTIONS OF FICTION | Chapter Six
In the first few frames of Ex-Lover, Akari is a woman who has everything. She has an apartment with a view of Tokyo Tower; she has a jet-setting job with a jeweller that just took her to Paris; best of all, she has the perfect man. He’s tall, dark, handsome, a highflying accountant, he’s perfect down to his Tokyo University degree and to make things even more perfect, he’s in her bed now. In the sweet afterglow of lovemaking, she gets him to try on his new nude tie from Paris. He tries it on. Then he gets up to announce he’s going home. She asks him to stay. He’s out her door. And her night sours.
In the light of day, it is also obvious that she’s terrible at her job. Her heart isn’t in it. She’s 29, marriage is on her mind but she’s also terrible at getting a man to marry her. The perfect man, Hayato, isn’t interested. He says he wants to be with her forever without ever having to marry her. She says she wants what he wants…she’s lying. And the thing is…he’s a bit of an iceberg. Sometimes being beside him is as lonely as being on her own.
So she falls in bed with her ex-boyfriend, Arashi. He was nuts about her seven years ago but she broke up with him for being a ne’er-do-well. Now he’s successful – but married – but still nuts about her. And as she says to the iceberg, she’s better off being with the matrimonially unavailable man than the emotionally unavailable one.
The iceberg was playing it cool all along. But he can’t be cool anymore. Someone has to save her from a life as a mistress. He has to marry her. She says no thanks at first. But he hears her parents aren’t doing well – they haven’t been happy since their small toy shop closed down – and he calls on them to cheer them up. So it is that she comes home to such heart-warming domestic bliss and has second thoughts, “Is this what the lie of marriage is about?”
And you are going, why is she going on and on about this TV show?
Actually I don’t know if this is such a good show. (Er I have a thing about the iceberg i.e. Abe Hiroshi?) But to me it shows the pain-pleasure cycle of some relationships so well: the smallness of the joys snatched, the comforts you cling to, the uncertainties that eat away at you, the untruths and half-truths you feed each other and yourself.
A couple months ago, I was looking for a little misery to mark the first year of the death of a relationship. Ex-Lover was just perfect for my purposes.
In the light of day, it is also obvious that she’s terrible at her job. Her heart isn’t in it. She’s 29, marriage is on her mind but she’s also terrible at getting a man to marry her. The perfect man, Hayato, isn’t interested. He says he wants to be with her forever without ever having to marry her. She says she wants what he wants…she’s lying. And the thing is…he’s a bit of an iceberg. Sometimes being beside him is as lonely as being on her own.
So she falls in bed with her ex-boyfriend, Arashi. He was nuts about her seven years ago but she broke up with him for being a ne’er-do-well. Now he’s successful – but married – but still nuts about her. And as she says to the iceberg, she’s better off being with the matrimonially unavailable man than the emotionally unavailable one.
The iceberg was playing it cool all along. But he can’t be cool anymore. Someone has to save her from a life as a mistress. He has to marry her. She says no thanks at first. But he hears her parents aren’t doing well – they haven’t been happy since their small toy shop closed down – and he calls on them to cheer them up. So it is that she comes home to such heart-warming domestic bliss and has second thoughts, “Is this what the lie of marriage is about?”
And you are going, why is she going on and on about this TV show?
Actually I don’t know if this is such a good show. (Er I have a thing about the iceberg i.e. Abe Hiroshi?) But to me it shows the pain-pleasure cycle of some relationships so well: the smallness of the joys snatched, the comforts you cling to, the uncertainties that eat away at you, the untruths and half-truths you feed each other and yourself.
A couple months ago, I was looking for a little misery to mark the first year of the death of a relationship. Ex-Lover was just perfect for my purposes.
Friday, May 26, 2006
THE FUNCTIONS OF FICTION | Chapter Five
When the going gets tough, some Cantonese go, chin sai. (I.e. previous life i.e. what did I do in my previous life?) On the one hand we don’t want to blame others. But on the other hand we don’t want to be too rough on ourselves – our present selves. So we blame our past selves. Really it’s not so much blame as some sort of resignation: The past self ran up a debt that the present self has to pay off lor. (Lor, by the way, is a sound that sums up Ng Man Tat, that walking talking sideshow of comic resignation in a Stephen Chow show. “I’m getting my gun and I’m going to die with you lor,” Ng tells Chow, beta policeman to alpha policeman, in his most memorable line in Fight Back To School.) It does get us going.
But coming to relationships, chin sai starts to sound negative: What did I do to you in my previous life? Do I owe you a debt from my previous life? The lover becomes a creditor, love’s loan shark, Shylock come for a pound of flesh.
So Cao Xueqin is the poet who has taken much of the bitterness out of the equation, if you ask me, by giving an account of what the creditor did. In his Dream Of The Red Chamber (the version I vaguely remember from reading the first few chapters aeons ago), Jia Baoyu is the incarnation of a magic stone and Lin Daiyu, that of a flower. In their previous lives, the stone was rolling along when it ran into the flower which it liked so much, it watered it every day (in my mind’s eye, the stone was rolling here, there and everywhere to gather water for the thirsty flower – I don’t know if I’m remembering or imagining that). So the flower was so thankful, it said it would repay the stone for the water in their next lives. In Daiyu’s tears.
Beautiful story, isn’t it? I feel so. I felt so. How I did drown, in my own way, in the beauty of the story. When I was with Oscar – through the break-ups and the kiss-and-make-ups – I thought there had to be a reason. Why did he come back for more after the nth parting? Why did I go back for more? I thought there had to be a debt. I tried to think of it positively. Sometimes I even scolded myself, “You owe him means you owe him. Run away now and you will still owe him in your next life.”
When the big one came – the 9 Richter break-up of no return – so did a sense of relief: I’m not as deep in debt as I believed.
But the tale of the debt of tears is beautiful. I do want to read the rest of that book.
But coming to relationships, chin sai starts to sound negative: What did I do to you in my previous life? Do I owe you a debt from my previous life? The lover becomes a creditor, love’s loan shark, Shylock come for a pound of flesh.
So Cao Xueqin is the poet who has taken much of the bitterness out of the equation, if you ask me, by giving an account of what the creditor did. In his Dream Of The Red Chamber (the version I vaguely remember from reading the first few chapters aeons ago), Jia Baoyu is the incarnation of a magic stone and Lin Daiyu, that of a flower. In their previous lives, the stone was rolling along when it ran into the flower which it liked so much, it watered it every day (in my mind’s eye, the stone was rolling here, there and everywhere to gather water for the thirsty flower – I don’t know if I’m remembering or imagining that). So the flower was so thankful, it said it would repay the stone for the water in their next lives. In Daiyu’s tears.
Beautiful story, isn’t it? I feel so. I felt so. How I did drown, in my own way, in the beauty of the story. When I was with Oscar – through the break-ups and the kiss-and-make-ups – I thought there had to be a reason. Why did he come back for more after the nth parting? Why did I go back for more? I thought there had to be a debt. I tried to think of it positively. Sometimes I even scolded myself, “You owe him means you owe him. Run away now and you will still owe him in your next life.”
When the big one came – the 9 Richter break-up of no return – so did a sense of relief: I’m not as deep in debt as I believed.
But the tale of the debt of tears is beautiful. I do want to read the rest of that book.
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
THE FUNCTIONS OF FICTION | Chapter Four
These are a few of my comfort foods: my mother’s rice noodles, Milo with crackers and Meteor Garden. Meteor Garden – it’s Pride And Prejudice lite with Jerry Yen as Darcy – is my chocolate. On downhearted days I pop it into the DVD machine’s mouth and press Play. Instant happiness.
There are days chocolate isn’t enough though. Like when first love crashes, becomes first break-up in a foreign country – a friend’s friend takes you in, gives you a shoulder to cry on – you go broke calling friends back home – you don’t know what to do with yourself. I didn’t know what to do with myself that summer Down Under. Then I found myself buying a book, Robertson Davies’ The Rebel Angels, for the friend’s friend and in the middle of writing her a thank-you-for-everything note, I began to reread the book in her kitchen.
Davies has been one of my friends from the first time we met in NUS. That was where I borrowed my first Davies, that is. I really don’t remember if I found him on my own or only after reading his obituary, an inspiring one by The Economist. But I thank the day we met. His is the warmest and wisest of voices – he wrote his best books late in life when he was in his 50s and 60s – and that day in the kitchen, he wasn’t just telling me about Maria Magdalena Theotoky, this beautiful brilliant scholar of Rabelais and how she gets her man and her manuscript; about the body-personality types, ectomorph (scrawny, sex-starved, intellectual), mesomorph (muscular, go-getting), endomorph (plump, pleasure-seeking); about Simon Darcourt, this professor of Greek who may or may not be in love with Maria after he accidentally drinks coffee mixed with her menstrual blood…
Davies was telling me, it’s gonna be okay girl.
There are days chocolate isn’t enough though. Like when first love crashes, becomes first break-up in a foreign country – a friend’s friend takes you in, gives you a shoulder to cry on – you go broke calling friends back home – you don’t know what to do with yourself. I didn’t know what to do with myself that summer Down Under. Then I found myself buying a book, Robertson Davies’ The Rebel Angels, for the friend’s friend and in the middle of writing her a thank-you-for-everything note, I began to reread the book in her kitchen.
Davies has been one of my friends from the first time we met in NUS. That was where I borrowed my first Davies, that is. I really don’t remember if I found him on my own or only after reading his obituary, an inspiring one by The Economist. But I thank the day we met. His is the warmest and wisest of voices – he wrote his best books late in life when he was in his 50s and 60s – and that day in the kitchen, he wasn’t just telling me about Maria Magdalena Theotoky, this beautiful brilliant scholar of Rabelais and how she gets her man and her manuscript; about the body-personality types, ectomorph (scrawny, sex-starved, intellectual), mesomorph (muscular, go-getting), endomorph (plump, pleasure-seeking); about Simon Darcourt, this professor of Greek who may or may not be in love with Maria after he accidentally drinks coffee mixed with her menstrual blood…
Davies was telling me, it’s gonna be okay girl.
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
"I believed he was pregnant"
Isabella Rossellini on her famous - and fat - father:
Until recently, both my parents were in just about every encyclopaedia. I check. When my father's entry emphasises his marriage to my mother, I know it's an American edition. When the emphasis is on his revolutionary and innovative work as a film-maker, I know it's a European edition. In Chinese encyclopaedias my mother isn't mentioned at all and my father's work is described as "non-bourgeois telling true stories about the proletariat." That's the communist edition. There are many ways to love my parents. Then there is my way, which is mine only.
Let me add something about my dad that I can say only now that he's dead. He was fat. In my family, this fact was always diplomatically diminished with: "He's not fat, he's robust."
When we were children (there were seven of us), one of our favourite games was throwing ourselves on to daddy's body. Lying on his side, he pretended to be the sow and we were the piglets. My daddy always regretted not being able to nurse us in real life, though for a long time I believed he was pregnant.
I liked him just as he was, fat or robust, whatever one wants to call it. People who talked to him about dieting irritated me - I didn't want less of him. He was soft to embrace, and there was a lot of him. I wanted him a lot, and I wanted all of him.
Most of all, I remember my dad in bed - he loved being in bed. He stayed in bed all day long; he didn't want to waste energy. You can call him lazy, but I still connect physical laziness to the kind of spiritual and intellectual wisdom my father possessed. If someone strikes me as lazy, my first reaction is to listen carefully to what he says for some possible great truth. As an adult, I like a "lazy body" look in bed. An athletic body with muscles I could never love.
Monday, May 08, 2006
THE FUNCTIONS OF FICTION | Chapter Three
My mother has never been much of a storyteller. She was more of a buyer of Chinese storybooks, when we were kids. Before my brother and I went to school and on the stock school kids’ diet of Tintin, Enid Blyton and Asterix, she fed us stories about the foolish monkeys who believed four acorns in the morning and three at night was better than three in the morning and four at night; the fool who got his feet measured to go shopping for shoes but forgot the measurement and had to go home empty-handed; and so on and so forth. Never mind that we were too young for some of the stories, which were simplified but not dumbed down from Zhuangzi, Hanfeizi and other old philosophy texts.
My mother has never been much of a storyteller. She married one, isn’t it enough? She would be the one who bought us a kids’ edition of Journey To The West and my father would be the one who brought it to life for us, with exciting exaggerations, in weekly instalments. His hero in storytelling was Lei Dai Soh, Rediffusion’s Cantonese charmer in the 1950s (Dai Soh, Big Fool, what a name). Week after week, as he ad-libbed his way through Journey To The West, my father became our Lei Dai Soh.
My mother has never been much of a storyteller. But as kids, we came to expect a good story from her every time she had a fight with my father. Fight. Story. Fight. Story. Fight. Story. Telling us stories, it was her therapy. These were all true stories of my father’s Dickensian days as a child coolie. He hardly told us these stories, so we had to hear them from my mother, who told them so well, she must have told them, line for line, as they were told to her by her Lei Dai Soh. She must have loved these stories. She did only one thing differently: Her stories always ended with, “Your father is a good man.”
I am my mother’s daughter. Oscar was a man with many tales. Of central Asia, of central Europe, of Effendi.
My mother has never been much of a storyteller. She married one, isn’t it enough? She would be the one who bought us a kids’ edition of Journey To The West and my father would be the one who brought it to life for us, with exciting exaggerations, in weekly instalments. His hero in storytelling was Lei Dai Soh, Rediffusion’s Cantonese charmer in the 1950s (Dai Soh, Big Fool, what a name). Week after week, as he ad-libbed his way through Journey To The West, my father became our Lei Dai Soh.
My mother has never been much of a storyteller. But as kids, we came to expect a good story from her every time she had a fight with my father. Fight. Story. Fight. Story. Fight. Story. Telling us stories, it was her therapy. These were all true stories of my father’s Dickensian days as a child coolie. He hardly told us these stories, so we had to hear them from my mother, who told them so well, she must have told them, line for line, as they were told to her by her Lei Dai Soh. She must have loved these stories. She did only one thing differently: Her stories always ended with, “Your father is a good man.”
I am my mother’s daughter. Oscar was a man with many tales. Of central Asia, of central Europe, of Effendi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)